After Moving Past. . .

After Moving Past. . .
Student movement like waves that never aside the beach. Wave was so big, but it will be a scum-scum who split when akan aside the beach.
Likewise Daniel Dhakidae describe student movement. The student movement are indeed moral force-feed that always appear in a crisis situation. 1998 students topple Soeharto dictatorship. Similarly, in 1966 Soekarno otoritarian overthrow. While some considered the student movement is always a political ditunggangi. But can not be denied that the movement is able to give students the wind changes for the life of a nation and state.
However, after the successful overthrow authoritarian regime or dictatorship movement of students back into yeast-foam. After the motion made by the masif all elements meha-students in the defeat of a regime, elements of the students split again.
Divisions in the student movement that appear in some period. At both the'98 student movement and student movement of'66, after the successful menggu-ling regime. These divisions would result in the student movement is not able to oversee the structure of government or control any changes that are expected according to the principles of democracy.
Is reasonable if the perpe-cahan because of differences in ideology of each movement. In this case, each organ has a student base of each ideology. That is the very root of the ordinary considering the socio cultural organization of students with each other, so different from each organ-students have very different ideologies. But a split is not fair when it triggered by political interests of each organ students.
According Wasid Mansyur, former head of the Surabaya branch PMII South, the student movement will not be, because the ideology of each of the student movement is different. So it does not matter. However ironic, the student movement when the ideology is meant for a particular political interest.
History has recorded that the student movement is always triggered by momentum. During this movement mahasis-wa happen because of the momentum-momentum of a national and global. So when the momentum was not there, the student movement back into ripple-ripple. Also, the post-movement merun regime tuhkan, maha-student movement to split and disorientation.
This Wasid Mansyur recognized that the student movement should not get stuck in a moment of national and elitist in nature. The student movement must create its own momentum that is against a common enemy kekua-based saan that justice and truth. Momentum does not come by itself. If the move only when there is momentum and movement students akan mandeg.
This is also justified Salman Al-Farisi, activist Network Fatwa Commission, said that the student movement during this happens because of the momentum of a national, such as the overthrow of power and criticism over the government. And student movements that have arisen because nyenthil.