Saturday, August 1, 2009

the Observation and Interview

Housing Wiyung built in two phases (Phase I and Phase II) pembagunan distance between each stage, about one year.

Phase I:
 The number of housing units around 145 fruit
 Type 36
 Each house 90 m2 wide
 6 x Length 14 m
 24 million cash purchase, credit 45 million, 10 million cash advance, installment per month about 200 thousand more (for the IAIN) The price for outsiders outside IAIN different prices.

Phase II:
 fewer number of units from phase I
 Type 36
 Each house 84 m2 wide
 6 x Length 13 m
 Price houses in phase II, more expensive.

 facilities each house the same, but according to some comments the source, quality home in a good phase II of Phase II.

 Some residents complained about the water conditions in the housing. This water comes from wells located in each house (from the facility developer). Perhaps because it is not too well in (about 5 - 6 meters). Because the facility has not been entered taps, up to now, the housing must carry the water to own the place penjulan water in the street (about 400 meters from the housing).

 While all housing units in phase I and phase II is terbeli, but not all houses are inhabited. In stage I, expressed as head of its neighborhood, about 80 percent have been settled. There are also rented a house (the home buyer but does not occupy the house DIKONTRAKKAN to other people).

 In the housing I and II, citizens also have started to create a means of worship (mosque) on the self-help communities themselves. Such as Al-Falah mosque (II housing) development has been running for around 50 percent. Some sources said, the mosque had choked-stagnant because there are constraints of funds.

 Concerns about the status of some land (that is state-owned, it does not own the rights akan dimilki home owner) was not evident. Some comments from people who already occupy, said that the status of land is the property owner's house. While this, indeed they can not hold (still in the BTN) to wait for installment payments lunasnya home.

 About the case in court, in general, not clear properly. So far, demand is understood as a claim, why do people outside IAIN can rent, but is for previous employees and lecturer at IAIN Sunan Ampel environment (especially those who do not own a home).

File a claim has been brought to the prosecutors so that some people had IAIN review (including the rector ridlwan Natsir). Comments sources said the presence of this check, ridlwan rage and requested to submit to anyone who files a claim for the pull out. Finally, the claim that dicabutlah from prosecution.

However, the problem has not been completed. With dicabutnya claim that, even cause the prosecution suspicious. Now, the information, said the prosecutors are investigating this case.

 The institution related to housing is Wiyung: IAIN (landowners), BTN (executor of the credit or housing KPR) and Cooperatives (Developer). To the last, still not clear, because the information in the field say that the cooperative IAIN (al-kautsar) and then delegate this to the developer of a company that is not too great leadership H. Nur Wahid (Tenggilis in the office).

No comments:

Post a Comment