Future Revolution in the Globalization Era

Hear the word 'revolution of the future' akan we may ask how we may know about the revolution later. Are not our own we know how to continue the relay the next life. As the treasury, this book are business-feed for memper-revolution kirakan opportunities in a variety of conditions that have at this time.
In view of this book reject the revolutionary perspective of contemporary social science. Emphasized that the more revolutionary changes in the state and class stuktur with violence.
Changes should not be a revolutionary force, based on class struggle, or the power at the national or international. Because it is a formal oppress on strengthening human rights, gender, ethnicity, age or class structure. Seizing power going through the pem-berontakan, struggling through the class structure, or violence and conflict that happens in it, is by Jeffery M. Paige: whether it can be revolutionary? because without it the revolution can occur.
Farideh Fahri also consider that despite the arguments about the end of the revolution as a historical phenomenon and a great time-bound, and the process twenty years ago, including a sudden fall countries that previously looked very strong, increasing the importance international network formal and informal , the presence of globalization and electronic media, have influenced how the revolution and change in the future.
Revolution has been developed into a resistance from wave-wave modernization during the last three centuries that appears in western Europe and the World. Noel Parker for the future of the revolution is the future of narrative revolusiner. Key changes and room for disagreement expressed by the narrative is a revolutionary state, with the claim that legitimize power relations, all the people. Instruments into the country 'negasi-self' of modernization, because under neoliberal domination discourse there is pressure on countries to scrap-dernisasikan 'governance' with menyusutkan their own.
Noel concluded that narrative revolutionary past is that a se-floating in the shadow of the global imaginary, with no countries get a reasonable revolutionary resistance. Strength of the narrative has a revolutionary new format where the opponent groups identified as a resistance group that is not based on the country. But it is cosmopolitan, religious, ethnic, insubordination, subaltren.
With the launch of Chase Dunn and Boswell, Farideh stated that the future of the revolution is seen as more than the world's national event, marked by bangkitnya and global social movement restrictions between the obscure and revolutionary social movements. According to the reflection revolution past can bear the potential to lock up the back of political power as a radical new entry point to project changes in the socio-economic development and the gradual long-term.
If democracy can go in the state regulations and rules can play a democratic run, the pole ideology was born from the beginning of the revolution and the potential for political (rather than social) of the future. This type of mem-agency human need through the process smooth and flake, through the gradual transformation of values in society, and this process does not have the end, because of disagreement revelusioner never complete.
So if the revolution defined as forced upon seizing state power through class-based rebellion from below, the answer is almost certainly not. If the brace is a revolutionary global spirit of'68 '(a form of revolution that has a utopian vision), then the future was waiting for us.
Finally in this book Jeffrey M Paige akan revolution offers more of the future depends on how memaknai revolution. Farideh Fahri look at things more democratic, demo-krasi can flow in the carotid KENE-garaan, in the proper order. Noel Parker is being further looked revolution can be a resistance against the attack or may be in a country.
By presenting arguments from some leaders, this book gives a new perspective for those who miss the change.